profile

Ambiri Sana

The Bronze Frontier


Published: Tuesday, 4 February 2025

You know what is fascinating about bronze casting? An artist's vision can be endlessly reproduced yet never exactly duplicated— each copy that emerges from the cast mold is both identical yet subtly different from all previous copies. In a world of identikit fashion, digitally replicated goods and formulaic music, it is refreshing to examine a medium where exact conformity is impossible.

The recent Christie's auction of 19th Century American and Western Art shows how bronze casting is a popular art form from that era. I can't help but see the parallel between the molding process and the mythology of the American West—a story cast and recast, each telling both authentic and altered, a narrative endlessly reproduced yet never exactly duplicated... N. Scott Momaday captured this perfectly when he observed, "The West is a landscape that needs to be seen to be believed. And, as I say on occasion, it may have to be believed in order to be seen."

Having spent considerable time in the Mountain West of the United States —where you can watch the tension between authentic Western heritage and Instagram-ready Cosplay Cowboys grind out in real time—I'm struck by how these artworks aren't just preserving history: they're actively shaping how we understand the West. Today, we are going to focus on bronze casting and how this specific type of art helped create the identity and imagery we associate with the American West.

Both bronze and historical narrative are flexible and malleable. That reveals something crucial about how history works. It's not just written by the victors (there's that too)— it is also shaped by the hopes, fears, and assumptions of each era [1]. When I look at these artworks, I can't help but dig deeper, wondering what stories they're really telling us— and, perhaps, what they're trying to hide. Stories can be molded, adapted, and changed with the times, similarly to what we saw in the historical narratives and its distortions in Aboriginal art.

All of these themes converge in my favorite piece: Remington's Mountain Man bronze statue. I've been obsessed with mountain men since my 4th grade social studies class in Utah. Seeing how Frederic Remington captured their essence in bronze just hits different. Between 1850-1925, bronze statues became the go-to medium for immortalising Western icons—and there's a reason for that.

Themes of the American West

Mountain men were more than mere frontiersmen—they were the architects of Western expansion, serving as the vanguard of American civilization [3] while paradoxically embodying its wildest elements. From 1810 to the 1880s, these explorer-trappers carved out an existence in the North American Rocky Mountains, their intimate knowledge of the landscape proving instrumental in establishing the emigrant trails that would later enable mass settlement. The transformation of their rugged hunting paths into wagon roads mirrors the broader transformation of the West itself: from wilderness to settled territory, from reality to mythology. Notable mountain men include Jedediah Smith, William Sublette, John Colter, Jim Bridger, Kit Carson, and Grizzly Adams [4].

Western art crystallised around several distinct themes: the sublime drama of untamed landscapes, the tenuous thread of civilisation represented by the military and wagon trains, the complex dynamics between Native Americans and settlers, and the daily struggles of frontier life. These themes transcend mere documentation to explore fundamental aspects of human nature: the drive to explore, the tension between civilisation and wilderness, and the cost of progress. To further promote this vision, individuals and their personalities were promoted to encourage the population to personally adopt Manifest Destiny, and glorify the agenda for future generations.

The mythologising of Western figures occurred almost in real-time: Quanah Parker, the last chief of the Comanche, became a symbol of Native American adaptation to white society; Buffalo Bill transformed from frontier scout to international showman; and figures like Annie Oakley were marketed as living embodiments of Western skill and independence. This commodification of Western identity wasn't just a later development—Buffalo Bill's Wild West Show was already packaging and selling the Western experience while the frontier was still being settled, creating a feedback loop between reality and representation that continues to shape our understanding of the era.

Each artistic medium contributed distinctly to the Western narrative: painters like Thomas Moran and Albert Bierstadt created sublime landscapes that suggested divine approval of expansion, political cartoonists provided visual propaganda for Manifest Destiny, and sculptors, particularly through the permanence of bronze, transformed fleeting frontier moments into enduring monuments. Bronze sculpture, with its ability to be both reproduced and subtly altered, became the perfect medium for an era whose history was simultaneously being preserved and reinvented.

Not all that glitters is bronze (but when it does…)

Before Frederic Remington began immortalising the West in his bronze works, he made many illustrations of life, stories, and scenes from the American West. But when he started casting pieces like Bronco Buster, The Cheyenne, Coming through the Rye, and The Rattlesnake something magical happened. President Theodore Roosevelt, a friend of Remington, once said "The soldier, the cowboy and rancher, the Indian, the horses and the cattle of the plains, will live in his pictures and bronzes, I verily believe, for all time," ... Teddy Roosevelt was many things, including, apparently, a romantic?

Bronze casts became popular partly due to their durability, which adapted better to the harsh weather conditions of the region. That durability led to a sense of permanence, which was comforting in a time of dramatic change. The material also provides the ability to capture detail and a sense of movement, which was another social and economic feature of the time. Bronze cast statues are also (relatively!) easily molded and manipulated (like the stories they promote and sell...).

Bronco Buster, Frederic Remington, 1895 (revised 1909, cast by November 1910) The Rattlesnake, Frederic Remington, 1905 (revised 1908; this cast, before 1939)
Coming through the Rye, Frederic Remington, 1902 (cast 1907). The Cheyenne, Frederic Remington, 1901 (cast by March 1907)

Lost-Wax Process

To understand the popularity of bronze artworks, it is helpful to examine the creation process. Remington spent fourteen years making bronzes from 1895 until his death in 1909, and in that time he created 22 different subjects that would be cast and recast for generations. He started with the sand cast method for his first few bronze works. Then, around 1900, he discovered the lost-wax method when he began his association with Roman Bronze Works [5].

The lost-wax process is the most popular technique to make sculptures. It involves creating a mold from a wax model and then pouring molten metal into the mold. While the process is primarily for metal casting, it can also be used for glass sculptures. Let’s walk through the steps of this process:

  • Model: An artist carves a design out of wax, every detail you can imagine.
  • Create a mold: The wax model is encased with a mold material, like plaster.
  • Remove the wax: The plaster mold goes into the kiln, the wax model beneath the plaster melts away (hence 'lost-wax'), leaving behind a perfect negative space.
  • Pour the metal: The mold is placed in a kiln and molten metal, bronze in this case, is poured into the cavity.
  • Cool and remove: Once the metal has cooled, the mold is removed to reveal the casting.
  • Finish: The casting is filed, ground, machined, or sandblasted to achieve the desired shape and finish.

Even with all of these considerations, multiple components can contribute to differences in bronze sculptures produced from wax molds. These include mold modifications, the quality of the mold, pouring technique, bronze temperature, and patina application. Each of these steps leaves its own subtle mark on the final piece, which is why no two casts are the same.

There are two primary versions of the lost-wax method: direct and indirect. The direct method is cheaper and faster, but there are two important disadvantages: first, if, for any reason, the casting failed then the wax model—the sculptor’s entire work—was lost forever. Second, even if the casting was successful, only one bronze could be produced from a sculptor’s model.

Therefore, the important innovation for repeated production came from the indirect method. This is more time-consuming and expensive, because it requires the creation of an 'intermodel', made of a more durable material (originally clay or plaster, then rubber, and more recently plastic). Once the intermodel is created, the artist can make numerous sculptures from the same mold (although, as mentioned above, the imperfections in the process still mean that the final pieces are not completely identical, even if they are from the same mold). Indirect casting permits the sculptor to produce numerous bronze replicas of a popular model, like the Mountain Man.

Remington was a habitual revisionist when it came to his dynamic bronze renditions, so the ability to make minor adjustments and tweaks to his molds before the casting process became essential to his practice.

The Mountain Man

With Mountain Man, Remington captured a masterclass in horsemanship. Anyone who's ever ridden in rough country knows that descending steep terrain is one of the scariest things you can do on horseback. It takes complete trust between horse and rider, the kind that only comes from countless hours in the saddle. This piece shows a seasoned mountain man with his equally experienced mount moving through terrain. Trust is displayed as the mountain man looks onward, not down at his steed; he is confident in his horse's ability to navigate the descent.

What he carries isn’t just equipment, it’s a wilderness survival kit. The rolled furs (his livelihood), the tin cup, well-worn chaps (trust me, you don't want to ride through mountain brush without them), and buckskin clothing meant the difference between life and death in mountain winters. The traps and rope sway at his side. Immediately on his person is an essential powder horn, distinctive Indian-style knife, and the reliable rifle [6]. Even though the sculpture is made from a single material, it has an incredible amount of texture differentiating the rough coat of the horse, to the smoothness of the rock face, and the garments and furs of the mountain man. But depending on which version of the statue you are observing, not all those details are present, and some may look different.

Details are rearranged, positioned differently, or removed entirely. The left statue has an additional rope instead of traps that wraps around the horse's neck, while the fluid reins and whip (instead of a crop) create a sweeping, almost balletic quality. It speaks more to showmanship—it's more dramatic, more theatrical, like something you'd see in Buffalo Bill's Wild West Show. The right statue is probably more consistent with survival and how a mountain man would navigate this descent in reality. The arm is braced against the horse's rump to not tumble head first into oblivion. The satchel and powder horn are positioned for quick access rather than aesthetic appeal. Even the horse's tail tells a different story—one version frozen in a classic pose, the other capturing the actual physics of a horse navigating treacherous terrain.

The museum's version (left statue) is an earlier cast. Christie's piece (right statue) came later near the end of his life. Some differences are clearly intentional— a result of Remington's obsessive refinements—while others are what I like to call 'bronze serendipity': variations that happen when molten metal meets different temperatures, patinas react slightly differently, when time itself leaves its mark on the process. Observe the difference in this other model of the Mountain Man below, in particular the rifle and horse's back leg.

Only 8-15 casts were made while Remington was alive to oversee them. Today, there are an estimated 74 casts out there. Each one tells us something about how we've chosen to remember—and reimagine—the West. It's a bit like oral histories passed down through generations; the core remains, but the details shift with each telling. This is something to consider if you're ever in the market for a Remington bronze.

Conclusion: Legacy and Reflection

As my father likes to joke… ‘it is a metaphor!’ And he's right—Remington's Mountain Man isn't just a bronze statue; it's a perfect embodiment of how Western mythology itself was created, reproduced, and modified. Roosevelt wasn't wrong about the staying power of Remington's work, though perhaps not for the reasons he thought. There's an undeniable energy in these pieces that transcends their role as mere historical documents. Even as we acknowledge the darker undertones of Western expansion and its artistic glorification, we can't help but be moved by the raw power of these works.

Like those bronze castings we've been examining, each new interpretation of the West both preserves and alters the original. There's something magical about how this brief moment in American history—only thirty years—left such an indelible mark on America's national identity. The rugged individualism, the pioneer spirit, the raw survival instinct: these aren't just artistic themes, they're part of how America sees itself today, for better or worse.

Historians sometimes say the period of European expansion in the 15th-17th Centuries was driven by the 'three G's': Glory, Gold, and God. America's westward push had its own trinity: Conquest, Cattle, and Creed. But I'd argue there's a fourth C we should add: Casting. Each version both authentic and altered, both true and mythological. And maybe that's exactly what makes it so quintessentially American.


[1] The American West and Manifest Destiny were not immune to this. Manifest Destiny didn’t just come out of nowhere, it was spurred as a result of the Monroe Doctrine, Louisiana Purchase, the Homestead Act of 1862, and the whims of political propaganda. It was all part of a larger, more dangerous game of chess [2]. If, at the time, Americans believed Manifest Destiny was preordained, then so was this cultural phenomenon.

[2] I'm not any good at chess, so I tend to use the French Defense i.e. guillotining my King and Queen because I'm hungry.

[3] Similar to the Aboriginal art piece, I'm not ignorant of the impact American "civilization" had on the native population. That's not my area of expertise, so I am going to acknowledge the controversy, but focus on the art and the mythology.

[4] Fun Fact: Some of the ski runs and lifts at the Teton Village Resort in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, are named after mountain men: Lower Sublette Ridge and the Sublette Quad Chair lift, North and South Colter Ridge, and Bridger Gondola. The Moran Face and run are named after the prominent landscape painter Thomas Moran.

[5] Another victory for my "All Art is Roman, and All Roman Art Is Actually Greek" thesis...

[6] Do you think the rifle is called Old Faithful? Because a geyser also shoots to great lengths? lol.. No, in all seriousness, Frederic's cousin Eliphalet Remington invented the Remington Rifle and subsequent Remington Arms company. I guess you can call that cross marketing.

We'd love to hear from you. Get in touch at Antonia

Ambiri Sana

Through our newsletter we deepen our market understanding, unlock value for our clients, and cultivate a diverse audience of intelligent and inquisitive individuals who are not traditional art world participants. We recognize a broad demand for insightful critique of art and the art world, plus an under explored dynamic interplay with the growing market for Digital Art. As we develop innovative products to engage and expand our audience; we are committed to creating value in the art market.

Share this page